<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twilight Was Bigger than Dark Knight?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:53:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Colletta</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-684467</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Colletta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-684467</guid>
		<description>quite intriguing post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite intriguing post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chanel 2.55</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-570447</link>
		<dc:creator>chanel 2.55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 05:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-570447</guid>
		<description>News Headlines And Popular Topics In New York</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News Headlines And Popular Topics In New York</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-365587</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-365587</guid>
		<description>I loved the Twilight movie: it was WAY better than the book times a million. 
However, the Dark Knight was the better! The movie just had more substance and the Joker... oh my God, you&#039;ve gotta love him! 
If I had to choose between Edward Cullen and the Joker, the Joker would win no contest; I love him and HATE Edward with a burning passion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Twilight movie: it was WAY better than the book times a million.<br />
However, the Dark Knight was the better! The movie just had more substance and the Joker&#8230; oh my God, you&#8217;ve gotta love him!<br />
If I had to choose between Edward Cullen and the Joker, the Joker would win no contest; I love him and HATE Edward with a burning passion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tori</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-350787</link>
		<dc:creator>Tori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-350787</guid>
		<description>The dark Knight is obviously the better movie here. Because Twilight didn&#039;t actually make more money the tweeny fan girls are resorting to things like statistics which has nothing to do with the quality of the movie. The fact that 170 million is four times the budget should say something in itself....Twilight was an okay movie but it isn&#039;t in the same realm as the dark knight. With a worldwide gross of 900 million and an American gross of 500 million it&#039;s the second highest grossing film of all time. In a year or so all the tween fan girls will have long forgotten Edward the sparkling vampire ,but Ledger&#039;s amazing performance will last for decades to come</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dark Knight is obviously the better movie here. Because Twilight didn&#8217;t actually make more money the tweeny fan girls are resorting to things like statistics which has nothing to do with the quality of the movie. The fact that 170 million is four times the budget should say something in itself&#8230;.Twilight was an okay movie but it isn&#8217;t in the same realm as the dark knight. With a worldwide gross of 900 million and an American gross of 500 million it&#8217;s the second highest grossing film of all time. In a year or so all the tween fan girls will have long forgotten Edward the sparkling vampire ,but Ledger&#8217;s amazing performance will last for decades to come</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhrutiiiiiiiiiiii.</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-341787</link>
		<dc:creator>dhrutiiiiiiiiiiii.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-341787</guid>
		<description>Not many, Renesmee Cullen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not many, Renesmee Cullen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhrutiiiiiiiiiiii.</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-341786</link>
		<dc:creator>dhrutiiiiiiiiiiii.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-341786</guid>
		<description>Twilight &#039;won&#039; because of screaming 13 year olds. Batman could easily kill Edward. Thus the fangirls attempt to kill me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twilight &#8216;won&#8217; because of screaming 13 year olds. Batman could easily kill Edward. Thus the fangirls attempt to kill me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariah</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-339826</link>
		<dc:creator>mariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-339826</guid>
		<description>i think twilight has a big fanbase right now.. but lots have love batman and will contiue to love it..im not sure about twilight. my mom and brother loved the batman movie.. but they would never go see twilight in theaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think twilight has a big fanbase right now.. but lots have love batman and will contiue to love it..im not sure about twilight. my mom and brother loved the batman movie.. but they would never go see twilight in theaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariah</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-339823</link>
		<dc:creator>mariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-339823</guid>
		<description>the dark night is better hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the dark night is better hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dark Knight</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-335474</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dark Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-335474</guid>
		<description>ok, I&#039;ve been thinking about this... so are people comparing whether the movies were better as in better liked or as in made or what?  Cuz i mean, everyone here is probably a total twilight fan, and most are not total Batman fans, but they seriously have probably a equal amount of fans since Batman gets the guys and girls in it, where as twilight mainly gets teenage girls.  As for Special Effects, Batman nailed that, and i kinda thought the &#039;vampire running&#039; in twilight looked like a stick person.  Twilight was awesome and i have NOTHING against it, but Dark Knight was a bigger film none the less. Both were excellent though! :D Very excellent! :D :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, I&#8217;ve been thinking about this&#8230; so are people comparing whether the movies were better as in better liked or as in made or what?  Cuz i mean, everyone here is probably a total twilight fan, and most are not total Batman fans, but they seriously have probably a equal amount of fans since Batman gets the guys and girls in it, where as twilight mainly gets teenage girls.  As for Special Effects, Batman nailed that, and i kinda thought the &#8216;vampire running&#8217; in twilight looked like a stick person.  Twilight was awesome and i have NOTHING against it, but Dark Knight was a bigger film none the less. Both were excellent though! <img src='http://twilighters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Very excellent! <img src='http://twilighters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://twilighters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://twilighters.org/2008/12/29/twilight-was-bigger-than-dark-knight/comment-page-1#comment-335454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilighters.org/?p=8650#comment-335454</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think that the word &quot;Ass&quot; could disturb so many people. Sorry for stating my opinion a little strongly but that&#039;s just me. thanks for sticking up for me shelby Cullen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think that the word &#8220;Ass&#8221; could disturb so many people. Sorry for stating my opinion a little strongly but that&#8217;s just me. thanks for sticking up for me shelby Cullen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

